Benchmarks

Ziptrek Ecotours UX Case Study

This is a case study of Ziptrek Ecotours’ e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 174 design elements. 250 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.

Ziptrek Ecotours’ overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. This is mainly due to broken Mobile Tour Details Page, Mobile Tour Lists & Filtering, and Tour Details Page performances.

First benchmarked in August 2023.


Performance11.2Poor

URLwhistler.ziptrek.com


Get Premium Research Access

Poor
Mediocre
Decent
Good
Perfect

Desktop Web

174 Guidelines · Performance:

Homepage & Category Navigation

16 Guidelines · Performance:

Tour Lists & Filtering

28 Guidelines · Performance:

On-Site Search

11 Guidelines · Performance:

Tour Details Page

42 Guidelines · Performance:

"Booking" Checkout Process

63 Guidelines · Performance:

Site-Wide Features

14 Guidelines · Performance:

Mobile Web

170 Guidelines · Performance:

138 Major E-Commerce Sites
CompareWhat’s This?

To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.

The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.


Ziptrek Ecotours’ Desktop Web E-Commerce Design

9 pages of Ziptrek Ecotours’ e-commerce site, marked up with 86 best practice examples:


Ziptrek Ecotours’ Mobile Web E-Commerce Design

8 pages of Ziptrek Ecotours’ e-commerce site, marked up with 97 best practice examples: