Mckesson UX Case Study
This is a case study of Mckesson’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 298 design elements. 255 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Mckesson’s overall e-commerce UX performance is xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx xx-xxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx, xxx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx & xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Upgrade to access Mckesson’s case study.
First benchmarked in October 2022.
Mckesson’s UX Performance upgrade
This competitor benchmark report is only available on a paid plan
Sign up to a Baymard paid plan to get instant access to 250+ detailed UX benchmark reports for your industry competitors and leading brands.
Want to find out what Baymard access can do for your team? Get access to 5% of our research, including 50 Best Practice Guidelines, with a Free Plan today!
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
Mckesson’s Desktop Web E-Commerce Design
11 pages of Mckesson’s e-commerce site, marked up with 110 best practice examples:
Mckesson’s Mobile Web E-Commerce Design
10 pages of Mckesson’s e-commerce site, marked up with 99 best practice examples:
Explore Other Research Content
Every week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
Drop-Down Usability: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Use Them
Format the “Expiration Date” Fields Exactly the Same as the Physical Credit Card (72% Don’t)
PDP UX: Core Product Content Is Overlooked in ‘Horizontal Tabs’ Layouts (Yet 28% of Sites Have This Layout)
Form Field Usability: Avoid Extensive Multicolumn Layouts (16% Make This Form Usability Mistake)
Form Usability: Getting ‘Address Line 2’ Right
See all 407 articles in the full public archive.